Denver is a city of contrasts, and the vote revealed just how much those contrasts shaped their opinions on the fur and slaughterhouse bans.

Is a business that has repeatedly failed to comply with federal pollution laws, putting workers and residents at risk, a business we want in our city?

The ordinance is not about imposing a one-size-fits-all solution or alienating certain communities. Instead, it aims to strike a balance between cultural sensitivity and the ethical need to reduce animal suffering.

Many recent employee testimonies reveal exploitative working conditions at the Denver slaughterhouse, challenging the company’s claims of providing “well-paying jobs.”

One of the most controversial issues in the fashion industry today is the use of animal fur. What was previously a symbol of high-end luxury is now increasingly viewed as a symbol of cruelty and environmental destruction. The days of fur are numbered as society demands a more compassionate and sustainable fashion industry, leading to … Read more

In 2021, Superior Farms’ Denver facility was sued over halal violations, religious discrimination, and anti-muslim harassment.

The slaughterhouse ban provides support for affected workers, directing the city to prioritize slaughterhouse employees in its green jobs program.

Superior Farms slaughterhouse borders the South Platte River but has been has been in violation of the Clean Water Act for 4 consecutive years.

As Denver voters decide whether to ban slaughterhouses, a sanctuary caregiver reveals the hidden emotional world of sheep.

CSU’s industry-tied study grossly inflates job losses from Denver’s slaughterhouse ban, using unverifiable data and ignoring environmental benefits.